in short order
US /ɪn ʃɔrt ˈɔrdɚ/
・UK /in ʃɔ:t ˈɔ:də/
A1 初級
phr.片語立即
The problem was resolved in short order.
影片字幕
為什麼波音公司花了十年時間才成功送太空人到國際太空站？ (Why It Took Boeing A Decade To Launch NASA Astronauts On Starliner)
- It's certainly an uphill climb, but that doesn't mean that they aren't a very capable company that could, in short order, prove its viability again.
這無疑是一場艱難的攀登，但這並不意味著他們不是一家非常有能力的公司，可以在短時間內再次證明自己的生存能力。
- that doesn't mean that they aren't a very capable company that could, in short order, prove its viability again.
川普就職典禮完整報導！ (Coverage of Donald Trump's Inauguration)
- and now we'll expect a fair amount of progress in short order if he's going to live up to what he laid out today." But as you suggested before, most inaugural addresses have something in it that's surprising or newsmaking, with the exception of a few of the phrases Trump used about buy American, hire American, talking about carnage.
國家
- OF PROGRESS IN SHORT ORDER.
進展，而且會很快。
安東尼波登 | Google 廚師們的餐桌 (Anthony Bourdain | Chefs at Google)
- and a Provence show in short order. I'm putting on what, eight,
和普羅旺斯。我大概會增加多少，八磅，
- stand up in the kitchen and get like 12 of them in short order which was
廚房裡站著，在短時間內吃到大約 12 道，這很
你能對一個人說的最浪漫的話！ (The Most Romantic Thing You Can Ever Say to Someone)
- We may need a sentence like: "If you ever stop being nice to me, I will leave you in short order." It may sound brutal on first reading—bitter, paranoid, a bit jumpy—far from what we imagine romantic to mean.
我感覺你完全看見了我。
- We may need a sentence if you ever stop being nice to me, I will leave you in short order.
我們可能需要一句話：「如果你對我不再好，我馬上就會離開。」
為什麼我們總是離不開傷害我們的人？💔 (Why We Can't Stop Loving Those Who Hurt Us)
- But for others among us, this is when we begin to show our distinctive colours. Hope springs eternal. Yes, the partner may presently be somewhat disappointing, but soon they may recover. Admittedly, they have become hugely unkind in many ways, but they did apologise nicely last week, before repeating their offence, and so there is a decent chance, we believe, that things will be on an upswing over the longer term. To outside observers, the faith that we have in our partner can appear quasi-religious. Why do we keep giving our unreliable companion so much leeway? Why do we hope against hope? Why don't we cut our losses right now and leave? Why are we so convinced that with just a little more effort on our part, one more discussion, one more long email sent in the early hours, everything will alter? Furthermore, perhaps why do we keep assuming that we have done something wrong and that it is primarily our role to apologise and make amends? The explanation is that we grew into hopeful people not by choice, but of necessity. We almost certainly spent our childhoods in circumstances where we had no option but to become enormous believers in our parents and, simultaneously, enormous doubters of ourselves. When little, we couldn't afford to think that our parents were simply disappointing, wounded people with whom we shouldn't interact too much and then walk away. We were four years old. So we did what children of unfulfilling parents always do. We started to think ill of ourselves. We developed a genius for wondering what was wrong with us and for assembling complicated and overly generous explanations for the bad behaviour of others. We evolved an expectant stance towards whatever morsel of love our parent might throw our way. We became excited by deprivation. All day they might have been ill-tempered and cruel to us. Perhaps at nightfall, they might say something sweet and ruffle our hair. This became the most exciting and appalling game of our lives. As adults, we continue to be addicted to this tension. It has come to seem that this is what love is, the pain-tinged, continuous expectation that an unfulfilling person might abruptly turn round and be nice to us again. Love is waiting for someone who was once slightly kind to resume their interest. It doesn't strike us that love might actually be something quite different, simpler and less tortured. An ongoing, reliable exchange of mutually respectful sympathy and gentleness. And if it's not this, that we should leave at once. Indeed, if we have the troubled fortune to meet a reliable soul, we will probably respond to them with a feeling of nausea and bewilderment and flee in short order. Perhaps back to the last unfulfilling partner. The toll we pay in terms of wasted years is lamentable. Whereas others among us can enjoy calm, kindly relationships, we will get locked into exhausting scenarios with perturbed individuals who very subtly mess us around, who say one thing and do another, who don't give us physical affection or blow hot and cold, who may be having affairs and keep promising to change and don't. And the worst is that for all our suffering, this somehow excites us, this keeps us on our toes, this feels like what we need to keep doing. We know nothing else. We have to start to believe what our childhoods never allowed us to think. Some people need to be given up on. Certain seemingly ordinary and good people are in fact very damaged and will hurt and bully those around them. Some people with a few lovely qualities to them will, considered in the round, work an entirely negative effect on our lives. It's not our role to keep second-guessing unfulfilling people, to spin elaborate stories as to why they may be doing what they do.
但對於我們中的其他人來說，這正是我們開始展現自己獨特色彩的時候。希望永存。是的，伴侶目前可能有些令人失望，但很快他們就會恢復過來。誠然，他們在很多方面都變得非常不近人情，但他們上週在重犯之前確實很好道地了歉，所以我們相信，從長遠來看，事情會有好轉的可能。在外人看來，我們對伴侶的信任似乎近乎宗教。為什麼我們總是給我們不可靠的伴侶這麼大的迴旋餘地？為什麼我們不抱希望？為什麼我們不馬上減少損失並離開？為什麼我們如此堅信，只要我們再努力一點，再討論一次，再在凌晨時分發一封長長的電子郵件，一切都會改變？此外，也許為
- Indeed, if we have the troubled fortune to meet a reliable soul, we will probably respond to them with a feeling of nausea and bewilderment and flee in short order.
孫子與克勞塞維茨會如何看待伊朗戰爭？ | DW 新聞 (What would Sun Tzu and Clausewitz say about the Iran war? | DW News)
- There's clearly been a desire to use both maritime and air power only, not to have boots on the ground, to have a devastating effect in short order, model presumably on Israel's apparent success in using force with devastating effects in short order in relation to its neighbors since the October 2023 attacks.
這就是為什麼這場戰爭在美國會受到來自民主黨和共和黨的如此多批評。
- There's clearly been a desire to use both maritime and air power only, not to have boots on the ground, to have a devastating effect in short order model presumably on Israel's apparent success in using force with devastating effects in short order in relation to its neighbors since the October 2023 attacks.
顯然，大家只想單純運用海空力量，不想派地面部隊，希望能在短時間內造成毀滅性效果，這大概是模仿以色列自 2023 年 10 月攻擊以來，在應對鄰國時，似乎成功地在短時間內造成毀滅性影響。
我們為何如此行事？ (Why We Behave As We Do)
- In certain families, it will, in short order, become obvious to the highly attuned psyche of a child that success here requires that one keep a very low profile and never challenge the reigning figures of authority.
在某些家庭裡，一個孩子敏銳的 psyche 會很快發現，在這裡要成功就必須保持低調，絕不能挑戰當權的權威人物。
- In certain families, it will, in short order, become obvious to the highly attuned psyche of a child that success here requires that one keep a very low profile and never challenge the reigning figures of authority.
在某些家庭裡，一個孩子敏銳的 psyche 會很快發現，在這裡要成功就必須保持低調，絕不能挑戰當權的權威人物。
荷姆茲海峽三艘商船遭「不明射線」擊中！BBC新聞報導 (Three commercial ships damaged by ‘unknown projectors’ in Strait of Hormuz | BBC News)
- Three cargo vessels struck in short order, one of them currently on fire off the coast of Dubai.
短時間內有三艘貨船受損，其中一艘目前在杜拜外海起火。
- Three cargo vessels struck in short order, one of them currently on fire off the coast of Dubai.
短時間內有三艘貨船受損，其中一艘目前在杜拜外海起火。